Rolex is a brand synonymous with luxury, precision, and innovation in the watch industry. One of the key components that contribute to the reputation of Rolex timepieces is the exceptional quality of their in-house movements. In this blog post, we will delve into a detailed comparison of two of Rolex's most popular movements: the 3235 and the 3135. Both movements are highly regarded in the horology world, but they each have their own unique characteristics and features that set them apart.
3135 vs 3235 Movement
The Rolex 3135 movement has been a staple in the brand's lineup for many years, known for its reliability and accuracy. Introduced in the late 1980s, the 3135 has powered some of Rolex's most iconic models, such as the Submariner and the Datejust. It operates at a frequency of 28,800 beats per hour (BPH) and has a power reserve of approximately 48 hours. The 3135 is a time-tested workhorse movement that has proven its durability over the years.
On the other hand, the Rolex 3235 movement is a more recent addition to the Rolex family, introduced in 2015. It represents Rolex's commitment to innovation and technological advancement in watchmaking. The 3235 features several improvements over its predecessor, the 3135, including a longer power reserve of around 70 hours, enhanced shock resistance, and improved accuracy. The 3235 operates at a higher frequency of 28,800 BPH, like the 3135, but incorporates Rolex's latest technologies to ensure optimal performance.
Rolex 3135 Movement Diagram
To better understand the inner workings of the Rolex 3135 movement, let's take a closer look at its diagram:
[Insert Rolex 3135 movement diagram here]
The diagram illustrates the different components of the 3135 movement, such as the balance wheel, escapement, mainspring, and winding mechanism. Each part plays a crucial role in ensuring the smooth operation of the movement and the accurate timekeeping of the watch.
Rolex 3235 Movement Problems
While the Rolex 3235 movement is lauded for its technological advancements and improved performance, like any mechanical movement, it is not without its potential issues. Some common problems that have been reported with the 3235 movement include:
1. Lubrication Issues: Due to the complex nature of the movement and the high number of components, proper lubrication is essential to ensure smooth operation. Improper lubrication or the use of low-quality oils can lead to increased friction and wear on the components.
2. Magnetization: The 3235 movement, like many modern movements, is susceptible to magnetization, which can disrupt the accuracy of the watch. Exposure to magnetic fields from electronic devices or magnetic closures can impact the performance of the movement.
3. Timing Variations: While the 3235 movement is designed to be highly accurate, variations in timing may occur over time due to factors such as wear and tear, environmental conditions, or improper handling of the watch.
Rolex 3135 Movement vs 3235
When comparing the Rolex 3135 and 3235 movements, it is evident that the 3235 offers several key advantages over the 3135. Some of the notable differences between the two movements include:
1. Power Reserve: The Rolex 3235 boasts a significantly longer power reserve of approximately 70 hours, compared to the 48-hour power reserve of the 3135. This means that the 3235 can run for nearly three days without needing to be wound, providing added convenience for the wearer.
2. Chronergy Escapement: The 3235 movement features Rolex's patented Chronergy escapement, which enhances the efficiency of the escapement system and improves the overall energy efficiency of the movement. This results in better timekeeping accuracy and increased durability.
3. Parachrom Hairspring: The 3235 movement is equipped with Rolex's proprietary Parachrom hairspring, which is highly resistant to magnetic fields and temperature fluctuations. This contributes to the movement's exceptional precision and reliability in various conditions.
4. Improved Shock Resistance: The 3235 movement incorporates Rolex's Paraflex shock absorbers, which provide enhanced protection against impacts and vibrations. This feature helps to maintain the accuracy of the watch even in demanding situations.
current url：https://hfxpah.k115t.com/bag/rolex-3235-vs-3135-62181
versus versace womens brick lane watch louis vuitton is bullshit